Breaking News
Loading...
Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Info Post
As Job Creators And Workers Watch Their “Expenses” And “Co-Pays” Double, Public Support For Health Law Hits “A New Low”
And VA Federal Judge Rules Insurance Mandate UnConstitutional

ABC News: Support For Health Law “At A New Low”

ABC: “Coinciding With A Federal Judge’s Ruling Invalidating A Key Element Of The Health Care Reform Law, An ABC News/Washington Post Poll Finds Support For The Landmark Legislation At A New Low…” (“New Low In Support For Health Care Reform,” ABC News, 12/13/10)

“Fifty-Two Percent Are Opposed, and that 9-Point gap in favor of opposition is its largest on record since the latest debate over health care reform began in earnest in summer 2009. More also continue to ‘strongly’ oppose the law than to strongly support it, 37 percent to 22 percent.” Ibid

Support “Slipped to 43 Percent, numerically its lowestin ABC/Post polling.” “The law’s never been popular, with support peaking at just 48 percent in November 2009. Today it’s slipped to 43 percent, numerically its lowest in ABC/Post polling. (It was about the same, 44 percent, a year ago.)” Ibid

Employers Face “Doubling” Expenses & Employees Confront “Doubling Co-Pays”

“Big employers faced with incorporating the first round of health-care changes next month are grappling with how to comply with the long list of new rules.” (“Firms Feel Pain From Health Law,” The Wall Street Journal, 12/13/10)

“Many companies are hiring consultants to help sort though the mountain of new mandates… as a result of the reform, SAS is doubling its legal and consultant expenses for 2011, says Ms. Mann. She declined to provide a dollar amount, and SAS wouldn't say what it currently spends on health-care overall.” Ibid

“To help get under the threshold level, in January SAS is eliminating its higher-cost indemnity plan and is also doubling co-pays to $20 from $10, she says. The company may still have to shift more costs to employees to avoid the tax, she says.” Ibid

The Washington Post: VA Federal Judge Strikes Down Part of Health-Care Law"

"U.S. District Court Judge Henry E. Hudson found that Congress could not order individuals to buy health insurance. . . . Neither the Supreme Court nor any federal circuit court of appeals has extended Commerce Clause powers to compel an individual to involuntarily enter the stream of commerce by purchasing a commodity in the private market," he wrote. "In doing so, enactment of the [individual mandate] exceeds the Commerce Clause powers vested in Congress under Article I [of the Constitution.]" (“Federal judge in Va. strikes down part of health-care law”WPO, 12/13/10)

Tags: US Government, health care law, unconstitutional, insurance mandate, low public support To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. Thanks!

0 comments:

Post a Comment