As senators prepare to vote on amendment to the Democrats’  financial regulation bill over the next couple of days, news stories continue to  point out numerous problems with the bill that need to be fixed.
The  AP notes today that Democrats have “agreed to jettison a $50 billion fund to  liquidate large, failing firms” from the bill, which is being offered by Senate  Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT). The AP story also points out, “In  their willingness to drop the $50 billion fund, Senate Democrats on Tuesday  abandoned a provision that Republicans attacked repeatedly as a perpetual Wall  Street bailout-in-waiting. The Obama administration also did not support the  fund, which would have been financed by an assessment on large financial  institutions.”
Prior to this agreement, Democrats were adamant that bailout  provisions were not included in the bill. President  Obama declared last week, “[W]hat’s not legitimate is to suggest that  somehow the legislation being proposed is going to encourage future taxpayer  bailouts, as some have claimed.” Despite these assertions, various  experts, the CBO, and other Democrats all disagreed on the bailout  issue.
Even The New York  Times editors acknowledge that the Dodd bill needs work in their  editorial today: “One of the most divisive issues in the Senate bill is a  provision that could force big banks to spin off their lucrative derivative  dealings. The provision was added to the bill late in the game, without  hearings. Opponents fear that it would push derivatives deals into hedge funds  or other entities that would be harder to regulate. Supporters say that the bill  would adequately regulate derivative dealers wherever they are. The Senate  debate, and hearings that can be scheduled before the House and Senate produce  final legislation, can help settle the issue.”
The derivatives issue is the very thing that prompted FDIC  chair Sheila Bair to write a letter to senators explaining the problems in the  current Democrat proposal. As The  Washington Post reported yesterday, “‘If all derivatives market-making  activities were moved outside of bank holding companies, most of the activity  would no doubt continue, but in less regulated and more highly leveraged  venues,’ Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila C. Bair wrote in a  recent letter to lawmakers. She said that [Democrat Sen. Blanche] Lincoln's  measure could push $294 trillion worth of derivatives deals beyond the reach of  regulators. If some FDIC-insured banks simply transferred this type of business  to affiliated firms, it could still pose a danger because the affiliates would  not be required to set aside as much capital as banks to cover losses from  derivatives trading, Bair said.”
And The  Wall Street Journal reports today, “Republicans have complained for  months that the Obama administration’s financial overhaul push doesn’t include  any resolution to the government’s expensive conservatorship of Fannie Mae and  Freddie Mac. Now, three Republicans plan to offer an amendment during the floor  debate that would force Democrats to take a politically difficult vote on what  to do with the companies. Sens. John  McCain (R., Ariz.), Richard  Shelby (R., Ala.), and Judd  Gregg (R., N.H.) plan to offer an amendment in the coming days  that would force the government to end its conservatorship of Fannie Mae and  Freddie Mac after a transition period and make the firms operate ‘without  government subsidies’ in the future.”
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid keeps insisting, “We have a  very good bill on the floor.” But even Democrats acknowledge that “There are  parts that need to be tightened,” as Sen.  Mark Warner (D-VA) said recently. And a series of news stories over the last  couple of weeks has highlighted serious problems with the bill, especially  regulatory overreach harming Main St. businesses and the complete lack of  provisions addressing the problems with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  In summary, the Dodd Bill Still Sucks!
Tags: Washington, D.C., US Senate, US Congress, Dodd Bill, financial regulation To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. Thanks!
Today in Washington, D.C. - May 5, 2010 - In Summary, The Dodd Bill Still Sucks!
Info Post
0 comments:
Post a Comment