Breaking News
Loading...
Sunday, October 28, 2007

Info Post
Yesterday. the ARRA posted a informative piece by Scott Miller, THE CONSERVATIVE titled the The Problem with Huckabee. With Mike Huckabee being a favored son in Arkansas, it is only right to provide another viewpoint. Professor Lucas Roebuck writes social and political commentary from a conservative, Evangelical perspective. Roebuck is professor of journalism for Northwest Nazarene Univ. He is the former managing editor of the Siloam Springs (Ark.) Herald-Leader and the Northwest Arkansas Times. In his The Roebuck Report in an article Fund's assignation of Huckabee misleading, he takes on Friday’s Wall Street Journal editorial by John Fund:
Fund attempts to make the case that Huckabee is “not the ‘consistent conservative’ he claims to be.” However, instead of constructing a well-researched case of examples of Huckabee’s supposed conservative inconsistencies, Fund strings together a handful of individuals who simply accuse Huckabee of being liberal with little or no factual support. Furthermore, what little evidence Fund does present is skewed by critical omissions of relevant fact. . . .

If an absolute hard line on immigration is more important to you than say, ending abortion, then Huckabee isn’t your candidate. Huckabee says on immigration, “My number one priority is to secure America’s border” and “those caught trying to enter the country illegally must be detained, processed and deported” (as opposed to catch and release). . . . Huckabee is as conservative or more conservative on immigration than former Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Sen. John McCain and former Gov. Mitt Romney. . . .

In considering Huckabee’s social conservatism, Fund either is talking out of both sides of his mouth or implying Huckabee is hypocrite. In one sentence, Fund describes Huckabee as “running hard right” on social issues, but then cites Texas judge Paul Pressler, who "led the conservative Southern Baptist revolt" saying that Huckabee “never appointed conservatives while he headed the Arkansas Baptist Convention.” Fiscal conservatives? Theological conservatives? Social conservatives? Those who like conservative hymns instead of guitar-led worship? . . . .

Every year while governor, Huckabee led the line in Arkansas’ annual Right to Life march. Huckabee also led efforts to pass a state constitutional amendment recognizing marriage as a bond between one man and one woman. Finally, Huckabee was proactive in helping to strengthen marriages in Arkansas by promoting “Covenant Marriages” as an option in Arkansas, where couples must see counseling before a judge will grant a divorce on grounds of convenience. Huckabee is not the perfect candidate.

His flirting with carbon credits and his weak stance against SCHIP expansion, both noted by Fund, don’t thrill me. But who can I count on to strongly oppose the infanticide going on in this country? Not Giuliani, who is self-described as pro-choice, nor Romney, who flips on issues like abortion for political expedience. Who can I trust not to raise taxes? Not Giuliani, who won’t sign an anti-tax pledge, nor Romney — again, whose flip-flopping ruins his credibility. Contrary to Fund’s assertion that Huckabee is an inconsistent conservative, Huckabee is a social conservative I know I can count on. . . . [Read Complete Article]

Tags: Election 2008, John Fund, Lucas Roebuck, Mike Huckabee, Republican To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. Thanks!

0 comments:

Post a Comment