data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/974b1/974b199207855fd80134c0efe315fed610e7fa7a" alt=""
On May 1, Sen. Schumer said on the Senate floor that the project “is not an earmark, this is not a specific project.” However, the Senate Finance Committee report published November 13, 2007 determined that the project is a “limited tax benefit,” or earmark. There are constitutional questions as well. A Congressional Research Service (CRS) memo dated April 30, 2008, says the earmark “could raise concerns under the [Constitution’s] Uniformity Clause because it explicitly provides a tax benefit based on a geographical classification.” The Uniformity Clause says that “all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States.” Since Sen. Schumer has been pushing this rail project since 2005, he is likely to insert it as an earmark into an appropriations bill . . . [Read More]
Tags: CAGW, Charles Schumer, Citizens Against Government Waste, porker of the month, US Senator To share or post to your site, click on "Post Link". Please mention / link to the ARRA News Service. Thanks!
0 comments:
Post a Comment